How To Search Google Scholar For Systematic Review

To be practical therefore most systematic reviewers will create search strategies that are precise enough for them to able to cope with the number of results that are returned but use different methods of searching eg.

How to search google scholar for systematic review. However variable retrieval of content due to regular updating of Google algorithms and the individuals search history and location means that search results are not necessarily reproducible and are therefore not in keeping with replicable search methods required by systematic reviews. Hello For my systematic reviews I often use Google Scholar more as a secondary source. I entered searched Google Scholar in the search box aiming to find articles with this phrase in their abstracts articles which would have to be systematic reviews I also searched the Ecosia search engine hopefully planting a tree in the process for HOW TO SEARCH GOOGLE SCHOLAR FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS.

This method helps information specialists in developing librarian-mediated searches for systematic reviews as well as medical and health care practitioners who are searching for evidence to answer clinical questions. Is Google Scholar enough to be used for systematic review searching. By combining keywords with Boolean operators and appropriate use of parentheses it is possible to construct search queries of arbitrary complexity.

Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase MEDLINE Web of Science and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. To search the full text of these articles enter your query as usual in the search box. For each Scholar search result we try to find a version of the article that you can read.

Ad Stop using clunky tools and enable your whole review team to collaborate from anywhere. This study investigates and compares the systematic search qualities of 28 widely used academic search systems including Google Scholar PubMed and Web of Science. Contrary to Gehanno et als conclusions that GS could even be used alone 16 we found that GS was not up to the required search standard for systematic reviews.

The search algorithm is not known and cannot be controlled Google adapts the search to each user in order to personalize information and as a result a systematic search is quite probably not replicable. For more information on how to set up your Google Scholar Library click here. Macros in Microsoft Word have been developed to convert syntaxes between databases and interfaces almost automatically.

To ensure adequate performance in searches ie recall precision and number needed to read we find that literature searches for a systematic review should at minimum be performed in the combination of the following four databases. Are not included in library databases eg some conference papers government reports articles from certain journals etc. What approaches can we adopt to support effective systematic searching using Google Scholar.